DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, GOURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO7385-14
19 November 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subs qa
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Fnei: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 8112/0346 of
5 Nov 2014 >
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced
to E-6/OM1 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Spain, Mx. Exnicios, and Mr. Green
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
13 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed ali the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
appiication has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Dowkel No.NRO7385-14
RECOMMENDAW LUN :
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/QM1 from the March 2012 Navy-
wide advancement examination with an effective date of 16 December
012 and 2 Time in Rate date of 1 Tuiv 2012.
Cea
b. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances from the
effective date forward.
cv A copy of sthis Report of Proceedings will be filed in.
Petitioner’s naval record.
4
4, Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
Recdyder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority “in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6le)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
19 November 2014
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Pyecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9678 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to E-6/AWOl from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on , 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8397 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE RO SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO8&397-14 19 November 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy sub): es Ey Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to B-5/MM2 from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4271 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, chat the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to E-5/FT2 from the Mareh 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Vogt, and Ms. Bianehi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant, to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4895 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received two award points toward his February 2012 Reserve Navy- wide advancement examination and that he was advanced to CM1/E-6. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0167 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5122 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received two points for his Individual Augmentation (IA) from June 2011 to April 2012 for the September 2012 E-6 Navy-wide advancement examination. Docket No.NR05122-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all.the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3145 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MN1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR735 14
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to IT2/E-5 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...